> It seems strange to have a default choice which is then overridden each Your 2nd post was what I was looking for. It describes a practice precious few people engage in here but I wish Take a look over here:ĭo a string search there on the word "habit" & click through to the link you'll findīelow that. In addition, when you do a Reply all, there's a bit of housekeeping you ought to doīefore you post. What I got had my 3 imagesįrom my most recent post attached. Reply to author is mostly for communicating with Jérôme about things to do You should almost always click the ReplyĪll button. Happen, you have to click the Reply all button. That your comment did not appear here in the thread where it should have. Have I hit the answer to your question yet? You can even make this different action your new default, same as you did for the other action earlier. If you don't want to use the default action, just hover the mouse over the right end again & pick a different action. You won't see the file selection dialog & the download will just start, going into the most recent download directory & using whatever default file name VDH has chosen.īut you're not stuck with a given default action forever. Then after this operation, for your next download, you can just click on the variant & it will do a Quick Download because you just set it as the default action. This will be whatever directory had been used on your most recent previous download. VDH will skip the file selection dialog & launch the download using whatever directory is in the default setting, as you have discovered. If you click the checkbox then Download, the next time you use VDH to download something, you can just click on the entry & it will automatically do a Download again, which is supposed to launch the file selection dialog so you can choose where to download to & change the target file name if you like.īut let's suppose you check the checkbox & then do a Quick Download. You can just click the variant & the same action will occur. Sad but true.Īfter you do all of that, the next time you open a VDH menu, you don't need to hover the mouse over the right end. But Michel has not chosen to implement such helpful logging so we just getĪnecdotal reports of this problem without any hope of getting it diagnosed. Some kind of debugging output log maintained by VDH during the normal course of We can't provide proper diagnostic information. Michel says he's never encountered the problem, so we're out here living with it because I have always gotten it to workĮventually but it may take 5 or 10 or maybe more tries. Your shoulders & you try again until it works. But I haveĮncountered the again & again & again case within the past day. Long time ago & there's probably been several updates to both the extension itself as Never get the file selection dialog to open properly but it seems to me that was rather a There was one user on here who said he could You just need to dismiss it and try again. Instead of opening a functioning file selection dialog, it opens a non-functioning Occasionally, you tell VDH to start a Download function & The latest Firefox so why not the latest of everything else? You might also consider trying to update the CoApp to 1.6.3 instead of 1.6.2. Updates the CoApp in response to the latest silliness that YouTube foists on the world. I do know for a fact that quite often Michel You might consider updating to the beta as something you might I'm using the latest VDHħ.6.3a1 beta (licensed) but I don't think that makes a difference. (It turned out to create a dwhelper directory, as it often does, and put files there, but unlike using the browser itself, it doesn't, at least on this Fedora machine, clearly show progress or location.I don't encounter this issue when I download from YouTube. As mentioned, choosing the user only option worked, though it wasn't really obvious to where it was being downloaded. Although, in fairness, the problem may simply be a bug, maybe one of those Just Me(TM) things where systemwide (which I tried first, when I had the problems mentioned above) simply doesn't work on the one machine I used for trying it. In the end, it worked fine if I did it for user rather than system wide, but I think a better README would have saved the trouble. Maybe there's an instruction that I overlooked when looking at the install script, but it's the author's fault for an incomplete README. At that point it installs, but just doesn't work, choosing to use the application instead of the browser gives a notice that you must install the application. Trying to run the install, one finds from the error message (which I suspect a novice might not figure out) that the untarred directory should be moved to /usr/local. In fairness to the one star reviews, trying to use it in Fedora, where I used the tarball, the README doesn't explain how to install it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |